Sunday, February 2, 2020

Politicians and Euphemisms

If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Politicians and Euphemisms. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Politicians and Euphemisms paper right on time.


Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Politicians and Euphemisms, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Politicians and Euphemisms paper at affordable prices!


Politicians have a way with words, much like used car salesmen. They must win the respect of the public so they sugar coat their words and make empty promises that are rarely ever held true. In times of crisis or war, they are expected to confront the public and find the right way to deliver bad news. Their choice of words is important because the media, as well as the public, will carefully examine every single word that they use. The euphemisms that are chosen to are often used to avoid the true facts.


In the speeches in our textbook all of the speakers talked about war or conflict. President Roosevelt used the words "a date that will live in infamy" to show the significance of the attack by the Japanese on Pearl Harbor. Infamy means evil notoriety or reputation, or a disgraceful, publicly known act. I am sure that all Americans have thought those exact words on other occasions, like during the assassination of President Kennedy or after the attack on the World Trade Centers. Those dates are also days that we will never forget. When he spoke of retribution, he used the words "we will gain inevitable triumph" to affirm his faith that the United States would win that conflict with Japan.


During the speech of Winston Churchill after the invasion of Europe by Hitler, he referred to the attack as having "penetrated deeply" and called the enemy an "intruding wedge". He used numerous euphemisms in his speech indicating that a great deal of time and thought went into what he planned to say that day. He stated that he had "invincible confidence" that he and his people would win their war.


After the attack on the World Trade Centers on September 11, 001, President George Bush spoke to Congress about the "enemies of freedom" that attacked the United States. His choice of words is fairly, yet he uses phrases that would be better accepted if he were more straight-forward. He made the statement that he was not "deceived by their pretences to piety" instead of just saying hypocrite, which is a much more harsh accusation. He does try to convince the audience in no uncertain terms that war is the only option for revenge. His words "patient justice" indicates in some ways that he may plan to attack the enemy in the same manner, like a thief in the middle of the night.


Prime Minister Tony Blair speaking to his country shortly after the September 001 attack on the United States is so easy to listen to and understand. He states facts and assures his people that he is confident and able to use whatever means necessary to protect them. Words that may be considered euphemisms in his speech like "profound solidarity" or "given succor" are very much a part of the British language. He is the only speaker that does not refer to God when talking about war or conflict. His confidence showed clear when he used the words "defeat it we must" when talking about taking on the enemy.


Osama Bin Laden's video statement following the attack he directed on the United States is hard to understand. He refers to President Bush as the "head of the international infidels", therefore accusing him of having no pretense for God. I wonder if that statement was made vengefully in response to President Bush accusing him of the same thing. His point of view on God, or Allah, would offend even those not very religious when he indicated his thanks to him for helping them murder thousands of innocent people.


Ranking the above speeches in order of persuasiveness, I would have to place Blair at the top of the list simply because he did not sugar coat his words. In order after Blair, in my opinion, it would be Roosevelt, Churchill, Bush, and then Bin Laden. My personal opinion of President Bush is not high, so I am probably biased in my judgment on their speeches. I would say that from reading his speech that has the ability to persuade people with the constant direction towards religion in his words. I will certainly begin to pay more attention to euphemisms that I hear, perhaps I can send some ideas to President Bush.


Please note that this sample paper on Politicians and Euphemisms is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Politicians and Euphemisms, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on Politicians and Euphemisms will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality. Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!


Zora Neale

If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Zora Neale. What we n...